Informal Vs. formal Consumer proposals in Canada
An informal proposal, often referred to as a “debt management plan or program” (DMP), and a formal consumer proposal are both agreements with creditors to amend the terms of debt repayment.
However, there are many differences between the two. The table below compares a number of aspects to help you weigh the pros and cons.
Creditor actions/ wage garnishments |
Creditor actions or garnishment orders can be continued if the creditor does not want to participate
|
Collections calls, executions, wage garnishments, and other creditor actions stop because there is a “stay of proceedings” when the consumer proposal is filed |
Stopping interest charges |
Possible interest relief (voluntary depending upon each creditor’s policy) |
All unsecured debts frozen; interest stops accruing |
Legally binding |
Not legally binding; voluntary agreement between debtor and creditors to waive some interest |
Legally binding agreement after approval by creditors and the courts, and administered by a licensed trustee in bankruptcy |
Asset protection |
Usually keep assets |
Usually keep assets |
Amount of debt repaid |
Pay total amount owed |
Usually pay a portion of total amount owed |
Payment schedule |
Make single monthly payments |
Single monthly payment - the amount is set based on your financial situation |
Fees/costs |
Fees vary widely
|
Trustee fee based on tariff set by government and comes out of the proceeds of the monthly payment; no additional fees paid |
Uncooperative creditors |
There is no way to deal with a dissenting creditor, or to provide protection to the debtor while other creditors are considering the informal proposal |
As long as most of the creditors vote for your consumer proposal, the dissenting creditors have to go along with it
|
Repayment period |
Maximum repayment period of four to five years |
Maximum repayment period of five years |
Credit counselling |
Option of credit counselling |
Must attend credit counselling |